I miss in the article any discussion of why the court made this decision. How are the readers suppossed to form an opinion when they don't get the arguments.
I do not understand why the Serbian courts have such a problem to esatablish what happened at the hospital, after the fall of Vukovar. Most of the Serbs know who did the massacre, unfortunately very few want to talk. The best way to avoid justice!
I do not understand why the Serbian courts have such a problem to esatablish what happened at the hospital, after the fall of Vukovar. Most of the Serbs know who did the massacre, unfortunately very few want to talk. The best way to avoid justice!
I miss in the article any discussion of why the court made this decision. How are the readers suppossed to form an opinion when they don't get the arguments.
I do not understand why the Serbian courts have such a problem to esatablish what happened at the hospital, after the fall of Vukovar. Most of the Serbs know who did the massacre, unfortunately very few want to talk. The best way to avoid justice!
I miss in the article any discussion of why the court made this decision. How are the readers suppossed to form an opinion when they don't get the arguments.
IMAGE SOURCE
2 Komentari
Sortiraj po: