Washington is furious with Pristina: "You will bear the consequences"

Regretted the attacks on NATO and kfor soldiers? Fully protected with their shields, protective clothing and weapons where's the regret for unarmed, unprotected civilians who were attacked during a peaceful sit down? Borrell and the EU told Serbia a few days ago they need to decide which side they are on they can't remain neutral. I think there's no doubt which side Serbia should be on and it's not NATO,France Germany etc who bombed them for 78 days and continue their harassment, bullying and threats.

So, Hill you and your USA does not regret attacks on the Serbs. You regret only for NATO attacks. Please do take your USA with you when you leave, hopefully the door hits on the way out.

Smoke and mirrors, Albanians wouldn't have done anything without NATO's permission, why didn't kfor and NATO remove the albanian forces if they thought they were out of control? Can't believe anything from America, NATO or EU.

US is losing control over Albanians. They took this action way too early.
Vucic hasn't recognised Kosovo yet.
Russia is keeping them busy with Ukraine so they are in no position to start anything and yet Albanians have tried to force them to.

Mr. Hill is a typical American full of (B.S.), he can say what he wants but, in the end, NATO will attack the Serbs not the Albanians. This is an excuse to go in and change the Serbian government with a TRAITOR of their choosing... LOL When is the West going to stop lying NOBODY believes them anymore!!!

CSM is BS and doesn't go to the bottom of the real problem.
It's only the fig-leave Belgrade will get in the end, pretending they've obtained an important victory by getting an association without any executive powers. This was clear from the very beginning of this process and I said so years ago. This fig-leave will permit to Vucic, Tadic, Djilas and their ilk to sign away Kosovo. The more it seems difficult to obtain...
Got my point?

What a load of BS LOL. If the Us wanted to do something they could but this is a performance by Hill to show how the IUS "loves" Serbs.

Yeah, yeah yeah of course , that’s what they say in front of me and you. If that was true, the north would’ve been long gone. BUT …..

The attacks on Kfor and NATO troops in Kosovo by Serbia will not be tolerated and severe consequences will result. The Serb “civilians” involved acted in full knowledge and support of Vucic.

The attacks on Kfor and NATO troops in Kosovo by Serbia will not be tolerated and severe consequences will result. The Serb “civilians” involved acted in full knowledge and support of Vucic.
(Famke Grisch, 1 June 2023 05:17)

And what are you going to do? Set your goats on the Serbs? I love how stupid people always try and speak on behalf of someone..... will not be tolerated ha,ha,ha.

The attacks on Kfor and NATO troops in Kosovo by Serbia will not be tolerated and severe consequences will result. The Serb “civilians” involved acted in full knowledge and support of Vucic.

What a load of BS LOL. If the Us wanted to do something they could but this is a performance by Hill to show how the IUS "loves" Serbs.

US is losing control over Albanians. They took this action way too early.
Vucic hasn't recognised Kosovo yet.
Russia is keeping them busy with Ukraine so they are in no position to start anything and yet Albanians have tried to force them to.

Smoke and mirrors, Albanians wouldn't have done anything without NATO's permission, why didn't kfor and NATO remove the albanian forces if they thought they were out of control? Can't believe anything from America, NATO or EU.

So, Hill you and your USA does not regret attacks on the Serbs. You regret only for NATO attacks. Please do take your USA with you when you leave, hopefully the door hits on the way out.

Regretted the attacks on NATO and kfor soldiers? Fully protected with their shields, protective clothing and weapons where's the regret for unarmed, unprotected civilians who were attacked during a peaceful sit down? Borrell and the EU told Serbia a few days ago they need to decide which side they are on they can't remain neutral. I think there's no doubt which side Serbia should be on and it's not NATO,France Germany etc who bombed them for 78 days and continue their harassment, bullying and threats.

CSM is BS and doesn't go to the bottom of the real problem.
It's only the fig-leave Belgrade will get in the end, pretending they've obtained an important victory by getting an association without any executive powers. This was clear from the very beginning of this process and I said so years ago. This fig-leave will permit to Vucic, Tadic, Djilas and their ilk to sign away Kosovo. The more it seems difficult to obtain...
Got my point?

The attacks on Kfor and NATO troops in Kosovo by Serbia will not be tolerated and severe consequences will result. The Serb “civilians” involved acted in full knowledge and support of Vucic.
(Famke Grisch, 1 June 2023 05:17)

And what are you going to do? Set your goats on the Serbs? I love how stupid people always try and speak on behalf of someone..... will not be tolerated ha,ha,ha.

Yeah, yeah yeah of course , that’s what they say in front of me and you. If that was true, the north would’ve been long gone. BUT …..

Mr. Hill is a typical American full of (B.S.), he can say what he wants but, in the end, NATO will attack the Serbs not the Albanians. This is an excuse to go in and change the Serbian government with a TRAITOR of their choosing... LOL When is the West going to stop lying NOBODY believes them anymore!!!