njegos
pre 5 godina
From Cheerfully ignorant: "Since you posted your belief how Albanians resolve their problems between each other in connection with this article, the implication is that this event is an example of such a pattern. For this event to be an example of this supposed pattern, the attacker would need to be Albanian. Therefore, you claimed the attacker is Albanian. If you wish to correct your original statement, feel free."
In your above statement you say that I 'implied' that the attacker was Albanian. Then you go on to say that I 'claimed' that the attacker was Albanian. Which is it? An implication is not a claim. I would like to refer you to Webster's dictionary for more definition on the difference between the two words. You really are cheerfully ignorant. As I've said in the past, nobody ever accused Albanians of being smart. Thanks for proving my point....again.
23 Komentari
Sortiraj po: