"Croatia to have some role concerning Kosovo army"

The KUKAVICI are back peddeling, no balls what so ever!!!

Croatia the leaders of balkans.

Do serbs feel ashame. They are so far behind croatia

We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)
--
Last time you just needed NATO and those cowards were too scared to send ground troops so bombed civilians from 10,000ft in the air. They were then forced to go to the UN.

the Albanians don't need training from Croatia because you know already how to run away , cry and hide like the croats did to the Serbs in the 90s and oh cry to nato for help lol so you will be paying them for nothing just like your army nothing....

Yes, like I said, NATO's minions continuing to divide the region. The Croatian army having any ties to Pristina will be seen as aggressive towards Serbia.

Good news is that the region is shifting towards Russia with NATO members Greece, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Turkey all seeing Russia as their protector and not the US. Romania will soon be joining that list but I can't see this occurring with the troublemakers of the Balkans (Croatia and the Albanians), which is why NATO is trying to cause further divisions. However, they are overwhelmingly outnumbered in the region and will have to deal with reality sooner or later.

I keep asking who is paying for this army and to this very day I have not received a sensible response.
(sj, 10 July 2017 12:29)

Who said you are entiteled to an answer? Dont worry about us, we`ll have enough to finance the Army. We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)

If Croatia actually takes part in this fuc*ery, then Serbia should respond by nationalizing all Agrokor companies in Serbia. For those that don't know, Agrokor is the largest company in the Balkans, based in Croatia and headed towards bankruptcy. It makes up almost 20% of Croatia's entire GDP. But what's also interesting is that while the company is headed towards collapse, its only profitable subsidiaries in the region are based in Serbia. Nationalizing these companies would be a crushing blow which Croatia would never recover from and this measure has to be taken should Croatia have anything to do with helping the KLA.

Croatia the leaders of balkans.

Do serbs feel ashame. They are so far behind croatia
(Darko, 10 July 2017 12:55)

Well there you have it. Due to Croatian superiority they have started a new trend; young, educated people leaving their homeland in their thousands, last year alone about 200,000 to seek a much harsher life because Croatia is so rich.

We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

Really? I thought you Albanians were victims of the worse genocide since the Holocaust, where the trauma is so great you can't even tell the difference between a soldier and a civilian trying to come anywhere near the homes they were expelled from.

You suddenly find your courage or perhaps stories of your victimization are a bit too hyperbolic? :)

Albanians will speak Serbian cos that's what they know BUT we'll call it Croatian hahahah

Who said you are entiteled to an answer? Dont worry about us, we`ll have enough to finance the Army. We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

I never expected a response anyway it was more of a rhetorical question, but its easy to talk about an army and its something else to finance it.

After reading the contents of the article, Croatia having "some role" in the creation of an army, is the same as saying the Sun has "some role" in the election on Donald Trump to the US Presidency. Nice Clickbait though.

Darkoko tell me are you insane or you just kiddin all the time. Don,t you see that Balkans are almost orphant for the time being and nobody is interested in you all ? So put aside your unnatural fantasies and think of peace only. Peace on all local languages sounds as Srb you know ...

(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

I never expected a response anyway it was more of a rhetorical question, but its easy to talk about an army and its something else to finance it.
(sj, 10 July 2017 14:18)

I appreciate your concernes about our cashflow but dont worry little grashopper, we got it covered.

I keep asking who is paying for this army and to this very day I have not received a sensible response.

Let's face this is just another clown trying to elbow his way to the prime minister chair. What ever happened to that other knuckle dragger, Haradjin? Wasn't he going to kick out all the Serbs from Kosovo? What's the halfwit waiting for? As I said if he had a thought it would be lonely.

Kurti is just another waste of space making promises that he cannot keep, but if it gives the Albos hope then why not. Promise them all that you want. I do like the part about the Croats army helping them LOL. The Croats dont have a proper army themselves so its the blind leading the blind.

Army is not going to happen. There's a little place called BondSteel in Kosovo where there are thousands of US troops. The last thing that they want is anyone creating an army near them.

Croatia will use the Albanians as backstabbers,
when Croatia comes for Bosniaherzegivina.

Arn.Sweden.

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.
(Zoran, 11 July 2017 11:21)

Right. And because the victory of the serbian army over Nato was so great, all soldiers, police and hundreds of thousend Serbs left Kosovo to return to central Serbia to celebrate the victory and never come back. The victory party is now going on for almost 20yrs.

The victory party is now going on for almost 20yrs.
(Gjon Marku, 11 July 2017 11:43)
--
That was a battle that NATO lost. There is no victory for any side after 20 years.

I appreciate your concernes about our cashflow but dont worry little grashopper, we got it covered.
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 16:59)

I am not concerned at all nor am I losing sleep over it, but only find it funny that an army can be funded by passing the hat around LOL. I can just see it now, Albanian Mall cleaners asking for more overtime to send money to buy boots for the military.

You guys have no idea whatsoever about finance

Last time you just needed NATO and those cowards were too scared to send ground troops so bombed civilians from 10,000ft in the air. They were then forced to go to the UN.
(Zoran, 10 July 2017 14:22)


Zoran,
It's lucky for you Nato didn't send ground troops into Serbia, otherwise your little brothers and young sons would be half Turkish.

Zoran,
It's lucky for you Nato didn't send ground troops into Serbia, otherwise your little brothers and young sons would be half Turkish.
(Nato Turk, 11 July 2017 00:31)
--
LOL! You tried and you lost. A combine KLA, Albanian and NATO battle against the Serbs ended up in your loss.

You are lucky coffins of NATO soldiers were not sent back. The political backlash would have been catastrophic.

CHeck ->
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/society.php?yyyy=2017&mm=06&dd=14&nav_id=101544
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ko%C5%A1are

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.

Ignorant Serbs traditionally celebrate universally recognized military loses but when translated into Serb language a loss is actually a "victory ".

I suppose when you're an expert losers making believe you "won" is a poor man's fantasy.

Albanians- many countries celebrate battles lost, yet fought gallantly with pride! I'm sure even Albs have those in history! I live in the US and we are very prideful with such battles...Vietnam, for one, how about "remember the Alamo"? Mexicans slaughtered us to the last man, but hey, we bring it up with pride!
After 78 days, NATO was begging for a "way out", begging Russia to get the Serbs to agree to the final agreement! U know it, the world knows it!

Of course NATO lost and ended up with UN resolution 1244 which was breached by the US and its proxies. NATO the most powerful army could not subdue little Serbia, reminds you of Austro-Hungary who was sent back to Vienna in there diapers in 1915.

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.
(Zoran, 11 July 2017 11:21)

Exactly... Serbia's goal in the war with NATO was to withdraw Serbia's army from Kosovo and, despite 78 days of bombing, NATO failed miserably to prevent Serbia from withdrawing its army from Kosovo lol

Of course NATO lost and ended up with UN resolution 1244
(Jugoslavija, 11 July 2017 16:44)

Sure, as demonstrated by the fact that Serbia begged the UNSC not to approve UNSCR 1244 (only to be ignored by Mr. Lavrov)!
----------

NATO the most powerful army could not subdue little Serbia
(Jugoslavija, 11 July 2017 16:44)

Sure, as demonstrated by the fact that NATO failed miserably to force Serbia keep its army in Kosovo :)

After 78 days, NATO was begging for a "way out", begging Russia to get the Serbs to agree to the final agreement! U know it, the world knows it!
(Watcher, 11 July 2017 14:55)

What the world knows is that Serbia begged Russia and the rest of the UNSC not to approve UNSCR 1244, because according to Serbia, in adopting UNSCR 1244 the UNSC wrote one of the darkest pages of its history being instrumental in the de facto dismemberment of a sovereign European State.

We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)
--
Last time you just needed NATO and those cowards were too scared to send ground troops so bombed civilians from 10,000ft in the air. They were then forced to go to the UN.

Yes, like I said, NATO's minions continuing to divide the region. The Croatian army having any ties to Pristina will be seen as aggressive towards Serbia.

Good news is that the region is shifting towards Russia with NATO members Greece, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Turkey all seeing Russia as their protector and not the US. Romania will soon be joining that list but I can't see this occurring with the troublemakers of the Balkans (Croatia and the Albanians), which is why NATO is trying to cause further divisions. However, they are overwhelmingly outnumbered in the region and will have to deal with reality sooner or later.

the Albanians don't need training from Croatia because you know already how to run away , cry and hide like the croats did to the Serbs in the 90s and oh cry to nato for help lol so you will be paying them for nothing just like your army nothing....

I keep asking who is paying for this army and to this very day I have not received a sensible response.

Let's face this is just another clown trying to elbow his way to the prime minister chair. What ever happened to that other knuckle dragger, Haradjin? Wasn't he going to kick out all the Serbs from Kosovo? What's the halfwit waiting for? As I said if he had a thought it would be lonely.

Kurti is just another waste of space making promises that he cannot keep, but if it gives the Albos hope then why not. Promise them all that you want. I do like the part about the Croats army helping them LOL. The Croats dont have a proper army themselves so its the blind leading the blind.

Croatia the leaders of balkans.

Do serbs feel ashame. They are so far behind croatia

If Croatia actually takes part in this fuc*ery, then Serbia should respond by nationalizing all Agrokor companies in Serbia. For those that don't know, Agrokor is the largest company in the Balkans, based in Croatia and headed towards bankruptcy. It makes up almost 20% of Croatia's entire GDP. But what's also interesting is that while the company is headed towards collapse, its only profitable subsidiaries in the region are based in Serbia. Nationalizing these companies would be a crushing blow which Croatia would never recover from and this measure has to be taken should Croatia have anything to do with helping the KLA.

Albanians will speak Serbian cos that's what they know BUT we'll call it Croatian hahahah

Who said you are entiteled to an answer? Dont worry about us, we`ll have enough to finance the Army. We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

I never expected a response anyway it was more of a rhetorical question, but its easy to talk about an army and its something else to finance it.

We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

Really? I thought you Albanians were victims of the worse genocide since the Holocaust, where the trauma is so great you can't even tell the difference between a soldier and a civilian trying to come anywhere near the homes they were expelled from.

You suddenly find your courage or perhaps stories of your victimization are a bit too hyperbolic? :)

Croatia the leaders of balkans.

Do serbs feel ashame. They are so far behind croatia
(Darko, 10 July 2017 12:55)

Well there you have it. Due to Croatian superiority they have started a new trend; young, educated people leaving their homeland in their thousands, last year alone about 200,000 to seek a much harsher life because Croatia is so rich.

I keep asking who is paying for this army and to this very day I have not received a sensible response.
(sj, 10 July 2017 12:29)

Who said you are entiteled to an answer? Dont worry about us, we`ll have enough to finance the Army. We only need it to defend us against you, so we dont need much anyway ;-)

(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 13:29)

I never expected a response anyway it was more of a rhetorical question, but its easy to talk about an army and its something else to finance it.
(sj, 10 July 2017 14:18)

I appreciate your concernes about our cashflow but dont worry little grashopper, we got it covered.

Darkoko tell me are you insane or you just kiddin all the time. Don,t you see that Balkans are almost orphant for the time being and nobody is interested in you all ? So put aside your unnatural fantasies and think of peace only. Peace on all local languages sounds as Srb you know ...

After reading the contents of the article, Croatia having "some role" in the creation of an army, is the same as saying the Sun has "some role" in the election on Donald Trump to the US Presidency. Nice Clickbait though.

Army is not going to happen. There's a little place called BondSteel in Kosovo where there are thousands of US troops. The last thing that they want is anyone creating an army near them.

Croatia will use the Albanians as backstabbers,
when Croatia comes for Bosniaherzegivina.

Arn.Sweden.

Ignorant Serbs traditionally celebrate universally recognized military loses but when translated into Serb language a loss is actually a "victory ".

I suppose when you're an expert losers making believe you "won" is a poor man's fantasy.

The KUKAVICI are back peddeling, no balls what so ever!!!

Last time you just needed NATO and those cowards were too scared to send ground troops so bombed civilians from 10,000ft in the air. They were then forced to go to the UN.
(Zoran, 10 July 2017 14:22)


Zoran,
It's lucky for you Nato didn't send ground troops into Serbia, otherwise your little brothers and young sons would be half Turkish.

Zoran,
It's lucky for you Nato didn't send ground troops into Serbia, otherwise your little brothers and young sons would be half Turkish.
(Nato Turk, 11 July 2017 00:31)
--
LOL! You tried and you lost. A combine KLA, Albanian and NATO battle against the Serbs ended up in your loss.

You are lucky coffins of NATO soldiers were not sent back. The political backlash would have been catastrophic.

CHeck ->
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/society.php?yyyy=2017&mm=06&dd=14&nav_id=101544
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ko%C5%A1are

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.
(Zoran, 11 July 2017 11:21)

Exactly... Serbia's goal in the war with NATO was to withdraw Serbia's army from Kosovo and, despite 78 days of bombing, NATO failed miserably to prevent Serbia from withdrawing its army from Kosovo lol

NATO could not defeat Serbia militarily. That's why they went to the UN and failed there also.
(Zoran, 11 July 2017 11:21)

Right. And because the victory of the serbian army over Nato was so great, all soldiers, police and hundreds of thousend Serbs left Kosovo to return to central Serbia to celebrate the victory and never come back. The victory party is now going on for almost 20yrs.

The victory party is now going on for almost 20yrs.
(Gjon Marku, 11 July 2017 11:43)
--
That was a battle that NATO lost. There is no victory for any side after 20 years.

Of course NATO lost and ended up with UN resolution 1244 which was breached by the US and its proxies. NATO the most powerful army could not subdue little Serbia, reminds you of Austro-Hungary who was sent back to Vienna in there diapers in 1915.

I appreciate your concernes about our cashflow but dont worry little grashopper, we got it covered.
(Gjon Marku, 10 July 2017 16:59)

I am not concerned at all nor am I losing sleep over it, but only find it funny that an army can be funded by passing the hat around LOL. I can just see it now, Albanian Mall cleaners asking for more overtime to send money to buy boots for the military.

You guys have no idea whatsoever about finance

Albanians- many countries celebrate battles lost, yet fought gallantly with pride! I'm sure even Albs have those in history! I live in the US and we are very prideful with such battles...Vietnam, for one, how about "remember the Alamo"? Mexicans slaughtered us to the last man, but hey, we bring it up with pride!
After 78 days, NATO was begging for a "way out", begging Russia to get the Serbs to agree to the final agreement! U know it, the world knows it!

After 78 days, NATO was begging for a "way out", begging Russia to get the Serbs to agree to the final agreement! U know it, the world knows it!
(Watcher, 11 July 2017 14:55)

What the world knows is that Serbia begged Russia and the rest of the UNSC not to approve UNSCR 1244, because according to Serbia, in adopting UNSCR 1244 the UNSC wrote one of the darkest pages of its history being instrumental in the de facto dismemberment of a sovereign European State.

Of course NATO lost and ended up with UN resolution 1244
(Jugoslavija, 11 July 2017 16:44)

Sure, as demonstrated by the fact that Serbia begged the UNSC not to approve UNSCR 1244 (only to be ignored by Mr. Lavrov)!
----------

NATO the most powerful army could not subdue little Serbia
(Jugoslavija, 11 July 2017 16:44)

Sure, as demonstrated by the fact that NATO failed miserably to force Serbia keep its army in Kosovo :)