"Pentagon's clarification is good; now here's transcripts"
We are pleased it has been clarified General Scaparrotti's recent statements about Serbia and the Serb nation "are not the stance of the Pentagon."Source: B92
The Serbian Ministry of Defense (MoD) has announced this.
The announcement came after the US Department of Defense said on Thursday it was "misinformation" that prompted Serbian Defense Minister Aleksandar Vulin to criticize US Europe Commander Curtis Scaparrotti.
Media reported earlier that Scaparrotti, during his testimony before the US Senate Armed Services Committee, expressed deep concern that the lack of diplomatic activity contributed to the spread of the Russian influence in the Balkans, and when asked which country was biggest problem, answered - Serbia.
Vulin quickly reacted to strongly criticize Scaparrotti, saying that the US general had accused Serbia of being a danger to the Balkans.
Vulin also said that there had not been "a more serious, irresponsible, and more dangerous statement" since 1999 - apparently a reference to NATO's attack on Serbia that year.
Now the Serbian MoD said that for the sake of objectively informing the public, and in order to prevent various interpretations, it was publishing a part of the video of the testimony, as well as a part of the transcript in Englishm and translated to Serbian.
The press release, transcripts and videos are available on the Ministry of Defense website.
Excerpt from Hearings of US EUCOM Commander, General Curtis Scaparrotti, Armed Services Committee, US Senate, 8 March 2018, as published by the Serbian MoD:
Senator Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire)
- So, if you look at the potential of misuse in the future in the other parts of Europe, where do you see… where are you most concerned about future Russian interference?
- They are involved just every aspect of Europe in one way or another. The area that I am concerned about today is the Balkans, actually. It’s an area where the international community’s work, and the United States in particular, where we have been able to keep stability there. We began to work on democratic governance and to reinforce that, but Russia is at work in the Balkans. I think that we’ve got to take an eye on the area. It’s an area where, in terms of diplomacy, we have to put some focus on, in my opinion. And we have to continue our security reform and our capability building that we as international community have engaged; and in the Balkans, it’s an area that we could have some problems in the future.
- You mentioned the diplomatic efforts… And how important is that we have these robust diplomatic and economic efforts in the Balkans?
- I think it’s essential. They view that diplomatic effort and presence, frankly, the people see that as one way to determine that the West is serious about their desire to be the part of the West. So, that involvement, I think, is fundamental.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Senator Tom Cotton (Arkansas)
-Thank you Chairman, thank you General Scaparrotti. I would like to thank you for joining us once again, I would like to continue the conversation about the Balkans that you started with Senator Shaheen. And if we tend to focus on the Baltics, since they are NATO countries exclusively, but I think that their NATO status probably makes them a bit more stable in terms of the direct threat Russia posses… and in the Balkans there are numerous countries that don’t belong to NATO… could you be more specific and say a little bit more on which country in the Balkans are the matter of concern to you in terms of Russian meddling and interference?
- Oh, I think Serbia. In particular… There is, there is a connection…
- Serbia proper? Or Republika Srpska?
- Serbia, well, I will tell you that it’s Serbia as a nation, but and a Serb population as well, within, within the Balkans. There is obviously a historical connection there, and affiliation… but there is also, because of that, a better opportunity for Russian influence. And they take advantage of that, in terms of disinformation, influence upon those populations, spoiling effect in some cases, perhaps with Serbia in respect to Kosovo or within the tripartite government of Bosnia and Herzegovina. And that’s my concern. I have seen an increase in that, I believe, in a year and a half since I’ve been on this job.