Comm. Parrisson
pre 13 godina
"no, comm, but i would think that the party that did win the most votes would at least be in the coalition government. nothing wrong with me, how about you? it would be almost impossible for one party to win a mjority of votes to not have to form a coalition, but why should number 2 and 3 be the coalition, and number 1?"
(ecoman, 23 June 2012 21:07)
Maybe because #2 and #3 have more in common, like each other better, want to continue their politics, or whatever reasons? I don't know where you got the strange idea from that the #1 party must be in the government. If they cannot secure a coalition with other parties to have a majority, they are out. Simple and easy, and as long as the ruling coalition has a majority, it perfectly represents the will of the voters.
Do you think a system like in Greece where the winning party is awarded with additional seats (so it is more likely that they form the government) represents the 'will of the voters' better? I don't.
7 Komentari
Sortiraj po: