lowe
pre 14 godina
“That's exactly what I meant. That China damaged the US embassy in Beijing, and had to pay the compensation. The Yankees took the money they cared about and couldn't care less for the rest :).
(icj1, 2 December 2011 06:16)”
I already know that you are insisting that’s what you meant. However my question to you was to explain how my statement “As for China paying for the US embassy, that was in Beijing. Blero was talking about the Chinese embassy in BELGRADE. Methinks the Chinese didn't mind paying the Yankees though -- the US embassy damage illustrated to the Yankees how enraged the Chinese people were.” is the same as what you meant when you wrote “4.5 million for 3 killed and 27 injured ?! Is that cheap the life of a chinese, or those were Serbs ? China also paid the US 2.87 million for damages to the US embassy.”
I reread the statements many times but still don’t see the similarity and, I suspect, there really isn’t one. My statement talked about Blero and the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. I didn’t write about 4.6 million, 3 killed and 27 injured. And you didn’t write about Blero. So how can what I wrote be the same in contents as yours?
104 Komentari
Sortiraj po: