Mobilni B92
 
           
   
  Insight | Gallery | Travel | Blog | Music | Marketing
 
 
Politics | Business & Economy | Crime & War crimes | Society | Region | World B92 live TV | Radio
Follow us on
 
           
 
All news
Latest news
Comments
Newsletter

SUBTOPICS
Headlines
Politics
Business & Economy
Crime & War crimes
Society
Region
World

Dictionary and Translation software by Babylon

 
B92 News Comments
Pročitajte vest Belgrade prepares to set up NATO mission
  4 November 2009

Send your comment

Comments: 19

  1. Ment,

    thanks for a rare sensible comment. I am a Brit who, like many others, protested against the NATO bombing of Serbia. I now live in Belgrade, and I am generally a supporter of Serbia. However, the inability of some people here to leave the past behind and look forward is so frustrating. My grandfather fought the Germans and the Japanese, but that doesn't mean I have to spend my life hating all the people of those countries, and teach my children to do the same.
    On the other hand, much of the appalling mess the western powers have made since world war II seems to be due to their complete inability to understand and respect how other cultures work. The tendency of people in the Balkans to carry grudges, hatred and revenge lust down the generations is part of life here, and hardly a secret. We may disagree strongly with that way, but we ignore it at our peril.
    (Resolver, 7 November 2009 13:33)
  2. The US and UK and France use the Serbs as an example of how they fought for the Muslims. Well, let the Muslims fight for them in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    (Zeka, 7 November 2009 13:22)
  3. MikeC

    I don't believe NATO is involved in Iraq. That's the mess of the U.S. and U.K. for which they both paid quite dearly.

    Afghanistan though is a different story. I personally believe it's a war that needed to be fought.

    As far as benefits...well I can only bring an example for Albania at the moment. It made the decision not to buy expensive planes to protect its airspace. It was agreed that NATO would perform those duties. For a small country with a limited budget that's quite a relief.


    Dragan
    ------

    I'm very sorry to hear about your cousin.
    (Ment, 5 November 2009 04:13)
  4. Astonished, disgusted & speechless all at once is how I feel. Regrettably I lost a cousin to back in ’99 to this MONSTER & not because she was in the wrong place at the wrong time, or not because of Milosevic, but because she was she was a resident of Belgrade & was deemed person non gratia for something that was occurring hundreds of kilometres away.
    Mr Tadic (with “Mr” being used extremely loosely) without fault again you make my skin crawl. Never did I imagine that we would stoop this low. Mr(?) Tadic, understand that we of Serbian descent are proud of our origins & morals, & in NO-WAY wish be associated with this imperialistic organisation.
    Cista bruka!
    (Dragan, 5 November 2009 01:40)
  5. Zvonko
    if you want to join NATO do it please,
    you have my full support.
    They need some heros like you
    right now in Afganistan.
    Take as much NATO & "Human Rights" Sorosian LDP fanatics as you can with you.

    And don´t come back without a medal!
    (D. Popovic, 4 November 2009 23:47)
  6. What are Serbs thinking??? They bombed us like 10 years ago and now you want to go and die for them?
    When are the next elections, surely Tadic will get the boot?
    (AdamSRB, 4 November 2009 22:53)
  7. If they send a representative to Brussels then the message is clear; NATO’s bombing of Serbia in 1999 was the right move and the Serbian people agree. I leave it up to the Serbian people.
    (sj, 4 November 2009 22:03)
  8. Ment

    Pleas tell me who will benifit from NATO membership except fot the US of A and the UK? I have some understanding for Latvia, Estonia and Lituania wanting to join but that's about it. Who today is involved in wars? America, in Afganistan and Irak. Who is fighting these wars? All of NATOs members. Without a doubt America is the winner when nations join. Finally they will have others who will die for them and their search for oil. We will be reduced to cannon fodder. While fat americans sit in control rooms telling us what to do.
    (MikeC, 4 November 2009 20:30)
  9. One of the benefits of belonging to an alliance...probably the main benefit..is cost.

    It costs less (as % of GDP) when you pool resources with others than when you go it alone, especially when you're dealing with advanced weaponry.

    Btw...just because Serbia was bombed in the 90-s does not make NATO an "evil" organization. In the end, it's a military alliance of national governments, not a government on itself.

    Times change...Germany, Britain and France are in the same organization today even though they fought each other twice in the past century alone.
    (Ment, 4 November 2009 19:55)
  10. I think it is absolutely disgraceful that the Serbian government would even contemplate sending any kind of emissary to this evil organisation, NATO.
    Have they forgotten about all the atrocities committed by NATO over the last 20 years in the Balkans? Look at what a mess BiH has been left in. Look at the grief that NATO caused in Kosovo i Metohija.
    I just don't understand this sinister move.
    In any case, what can Serbia hope to gain from NATO?
    My country, Ireland, which is situated in the North Atlantic Ocean is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and we are quite happy with our neutrality.
    There are certain horrible people in Belgrade who will sell their country's soul for a few pieces of silver.

    They disgust me!

    MB,Ireland
    (Micheal Breathnach, 4 November 2009 13:33)
    And there was nothing that Serbia did to provoke any of this, right!
    (pss, 4 November 2009 18:58)
  11. The West is giving Serbia the same exact message it have been giving Turkey for 50 years: join NATO and have your soldiers kill and die for our neoconservative empire, but fat chance if you think you will ever join the EU. And just like Turkey, Serbia is falling for it.
    (vladimir gagic, 4 November 2009 17:33)
  12. This is a positive step for Serbia. I would be glad to see Serbia a member of NATO too in the future. It's sad to read the misguided rantings of the usual anti-western fanatics.
    (Zvonko, 4 November 2009 17:24)
  13. Sramota!
    (Zoran, 4 November 2009 16:15)
  14. Its would be a disgrace if Serbia were to join NATO. Let albanians die for oil not Serbs. Little by little we are graged into the hands of evil.
    (MikeC, 4 November 2009 15:46)
  15. "A NATO mission is a waste of Serbia's public money and time."

    You want o join EU, right? Do as you are told and you just may get in
    (aRTa, 4 November 2009 15:36)
  16. "NATO is playing games with serbia"

    Really? What if NATO is also playing games with Kosovo? What will you do if you wake up one day to find that you have been a pawn in NATO's agenda?

    As for the article -- I totally understand the critical comments and it is justified -- just want to remind that there is always much more going on behind the political curtains and it's often difficult to tell what is really going on.
    (JC, 4 November 2009 15:14)
  17. A NATO mission is a waste of Serbia's public money and time.
    (Dragan, Toronto, 4 November 2009 14:07)
  18. I think it is absolutely disgraceful that the Serbian government would even contemplate sending any kind of emissary to this evil organisation, NATO.
    Have they forgotten about all the atrocities committed by NATO over the last 20 years in the Balkans? Look at what a mess BiH has been left in. Look at the grief that NATO caused in Kosovo i Metohija.
    I just don't understand this sinister move.
    In any case, what can Serbia hope to gain from NATO?
    My country, Ireland, which is situated in the North Atlantic Ocean is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and we are quite happy with our neutrality.
    There are certain horrible people in Belgrade who will sell their country's soul for a few pieces of silver.

    They disgust me!

    MB,Ireland
    (Micheal Breathnach, 4 November 2009 13:33)
  19. Why waste money on something that you will never achieve. Serbia will never join NATO, so why bother?
    Is is not because Serbia is not willing, but NATO is playing games with serbia and if that time comes, NATO will demand something that Serbia will not bow or maybe they will bow to that demand. Only time can tell.
    (Kosova-USA, 4 November 2009 12:56)

 
Wednesday, 4 November 2009
Print page Send page


 In focus
Euro-Atlantic integration
Serbians to travel without visas starting Dec. 19?
FM on EU application, Kosovo
Hague prosecutor meets with Serbian officials
Jeremić to meet Rehn, Buzek, Pack
Hague prosecutor starts Belgrade visit
Tadić: Mladić blocking integrations
“Serbia could integrate faster than others”
French FM weighs in on candidacy dilemma
Tadić: Serbia mulling candidacy application
PM opens Serbian Economic Forum
   
 More...
Serbian patriarch dies
Kosovo status
Economic crisis in Serbia
Vojvodina statute
Hague cooperation
Swine flu outbreak
Corruption & organized crime
Poll

Should Kosovo Serbs take part in the local elections?







Beyond Berlin: Next 20 years
Timophy Garton Ash
"You don't need to have any sentimental attachment to Europe whatsoever to understand that to tackle these problems we need the scale and clout that only Europe gives. This has nothing at all do ...


Appropriate Mourning, November 21, 2009
Chris Farmer

Where does the line get drawn? The passing of Patriarch Pavle, for whom all the respect paid to his memory was and is well deserved, allowed for some rather questionable decisions on the side of the government ...



 
© 1995 - 2009, B92 | Contact | About us | Impressum | Rules of use

 

Write us B92 Wap RSS news service

Radovan Karadzic on Trial: Follow news and in-depth coverage on