1. B92 received this, and every other article by this author published in the past, directly from the author. 

Regards,
(B92, 11 August 2017 12:19)

    ---

    That still doesn't explain why the first publication of this article was not referenced or why the "Source:" field in the header is blank. If B92 and this author can't adhere to basic scholarly principles, then perhaps the author should stop submitting previously published works without reference, or B92 should stop publishing articles by this author.



    (Amnesty Yugoslavia, 11 August 2017 13:52)

    # Comment link

  2. B92 received this, and every other article by this author published in the past, directly from the author.

    Regards,
    (B92, 11 August 2017 12:19)

    # Comment link

  3. Why is Ash being invited to write on this site? He does not have anything much that's interesting to contribute.
    (Bob, 7 August 2017 13:30)

    ---

    Ash wasn't "invited" to write on this site. This article was in fact plagiarized from another publication without proper reference. Ash's Anglo-Saxon rant was first published in the Guardian on July 28th, 2017. Unfortunately, the pseudo - journalistic editor of B92, is unfamiliar with the importance of citations and referencing the primary source of publications. The lack of intellectual rigor by B92 editors is evident in poor decisions on content, as well as corrupt scholarly practice.
    (Amnesty Yugoslavia, 11 August 2017 11:55)

    # Comment link

  4. Britain does not need reactionary Europhiles like Ash in order to discover a better future than being ruled from Europe.

    Brexit will have short and medium term disadvantages, but it will have superior long term benefits.

    There is no comparison between Trump and Brexit. However it fits the thought processes of Ash to make one.

    Why is Ash being invited to write on this site? He does not have anything much that's interesting to contribute.
    (Bob, 7 August 2017 13:30)

    # Comment link