|
Milosevic Cheats Victims of Justice
Author: Gordana Igric
Source: BIRN Serbia
Death of Serbian leader highlights flaws in ICTY
prosecution strategy.
Slobodan Milosevic is dead but parts of his legacy
may outlive him. It is a historical irony that he
should die in the same year that both Kosovo and Montenegro
are set to go independent, marking the final, crushing
defeat of Serbian nationalism.
The former Yugoslav strongman died in a prison cell
in the final days of a trial that broke records, both
in terms of its length and complexity. It dealt with
crimes committed in three different wars, covering
the territory of three former Yugoslav republics and
spanning a ten-year period.
That he should not live to see its end is a blow
to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, ICTY.
That he should die an innocent man is something that
he now paradoxically shares with over 100,000 of his
victims.
For those who survived, Milosevic, who has robbed
them of their existence once and orchestrated the
death of their loved ones, has done it again. This
time, he has robbed them of whatever justice the ICTY
could provide.
For the Office of the Prosecutor and its strategy
it would be an understatement to call his death a
setback. His death has shown that the idea of focusing
on Milosevic alone, rather than on all of the members
of the "joint criminal enterprise" that
he took part in, was flawed and has now come back
to haunt its authors.
Milosevic was the most prominent member of the enterprise
and the person who gave it a kick-start. But in order
for the effort to be sustainable, he elicited and
received the aid of different heads of the Yugoslav
National Army, JNA, and the heads of the federal and
Serbian interior ministries and secret services.
Some of his closest associates, such as the Serbian
secret service chief Jovica Stanisic and his deputy
Franko Simatovic, are in the dock.
On the other hand, JNA generals Veljko Kadijevic,
Blagoje Adzic and Zivota Panic are still living in
the relative peace of retirement.
Others will never be called to account for the part
they played in a course of events that eventually
led to genocide against the Bosnian Muslims. They
include Branko Kostic, a Montenegrin member of the
presidency of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,
who testified as a defence witness in the Milosevic
trial. Also amongst them are Momir Bulatovic, the
former president of Montenegro who was scheduled to
give evidence in Milosevic's defence this week, and,
last but by no means least, Borisav Jovic, Serbian
member of the federal presidency and Milosevic's mouthpiece.
That the end result of the prosecution strategy,
in terms of the number and origin of the individuals
indicted in relation to the war in Bosnia, is that
the genocide there has been made to seem like a result
of internecine fighting, has already been noted. In
fact, it was a systematic attack, planned and led
from Belgrade, on all aspects of the life of the Bosnian
Muslims - cultural, economic, moral and physical.
Of 344,803 Bosnian Muslims who in 1991 lived in
what today is the Republika Srpska, about 7,933 were
left in 1997 to 1998.
Genocide - the permanent removal of over 300,000
people, together with any reminder of their previous
existence - is Milosevic's only lasting heritage.
He was the prosecution's only bet. And now they
have lost. The fact, however, that Milosevic will
never be convicted of genocide, does not mean that
individuals associated with him or under his control
did not commit individual acts of genocide in Bosnia
and Herzegovina.
General Radislav Krstic - who at the time of his
arrest carried an identity card of the Yugoslav Army
- is the first person to have been found guilty of
aiding and abetting genocide in Srebrenica.
As part of a plea agreement with the prosecution,
Biljana Plavsic, a member of the triumvirate Bosnian
Serb presidency, provided detailed evidence of the
effective control that Milosevic's regime had over
the Bosnian Serb political and military leadership.
The ongoing trial of Momcilo Krajisnik, the speaker
of the Bosnian Serb assembly and a close associate
of Radovan Karadzic, will perhaps complete the picture
of Bosnian genocide as a countrywide operation.
Although not a judgment, the Decision on Motion
for Judgment of Acquittal, which judges issued in
mid-June 2004, following the end of the prosecution
case against Milosevic, is a good indicator in determining
both his individual responsibility for genocide and
whether Bosnian Muslims were the targeted group.
Having heard the prosecution evidence, the judges
made it clear that Milosevic had a case to answer
with regard to the genocide charges against him. Importantly,
they noted that, on the evidence available at that
stage in the proceedings, a trial chamber could be
satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Milosevic took
part in a joint criminal enterprise including the
Bosnian Serb leadership, and that he shared its other
participants' intention to destroy a part of the Bosnian
Muslims as a group.
In the same vein, the chamber concluded that "the
scale and pattern of the attacks, their intensity,
and the substantial number of Muslims killed, the
detention of Muslims, their brutal treatment in detention
centres and elsewhere, and the targeting of persons
essential to the survival of the Muslims as a group
are all factors that point to genocide."
It does not mean that Milosevic would necessarily
have been found guilty at the end of the proceedings,
but this is the only reliable indicator of the direction
in which the process was going.
In the four years it spanned, the Milosevic trial
has evolved from what seemed like an unprecedented
triumph for international justice into a legal travesty.
Milosevic's rights turned out to outweigh the rights
of all of his victims. And he cheated them again,
as he did in all the years when he was a "factor
of stability" in the Balkans and a "man
of peace". That it was the peace of mass graves
did not matter to anyone.
Emir Suljagic is a survivor of Srebrenica and the
author of Postcards from the Grave. He is BIRN's Balkan
Insight contributor.
|